Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 22 AUGUST 2019

Federal Circuit: Construe Disputed Claim Terms Before Deciding § 101 Eligibility

The Federal Circuit – in a split decision – remanded a recent N.D. California decision and held that the district court should have construed a disputed

United StatesIntellectual Property

Anthony J. Fuga is a Partner in Holland & Knight's Chicago office.

The Federal Circuit – in a split decision – remanded a recent N.D. California decision and held that the district court should have construed a disputed claim term before ruling on patent eligibility.

MyMail asserted patents that are directed to the method of modifying without user interaction computer toolbars, which are displayed on internet-connected devices. The defendants moved for judgment on the pleadings and argued that the patents are directed to patent-ineligible subject matter under Section 101. MyMail opposed the motions, in part, by arguing that the patents were patent eligible as evidenced by the E.D. Texas's construction of the term "toolbar" in an earlier proceeding. The defendants opposed the adoption of MyMail's proposed claim construction.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from