Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 18 JULY 2012

Federal Circuit Attempts To Make "Abstract Ideas" Less Abstract

On July 9, 2012, the Federal Circuit issued a split panel decision in CLS Bank Int’l v. Alice Corp., in which the majority attempted to make 35 U.S.C. Section 101’s prohibition on patenting "abstract ideas" more concrete

United StatesIntellectual Property

Originally published in V&E IP Insights E-communication, July 10, 2012

On July 9, 2012, the Federal Circuit issued a split panel decision in CLS Bank Int'l v. Alice Corp., in which the majority attempted to make 35 U.S.C. Section 101's prohibition on patenting "abstract ideas" more concrete. The court below granted summary judgment that the four patents-in-suit were invalid as claiming unpatentable subject matter. The four patents, which included method claims, system claims, and media claims, covered a computerized trading platform for exchanging obligations in which a third party settled obligations between a first and second party so as to eliminate the "settlement risk" that one side would not meet its obligation. The majority reversed the district court's holding that the patents claimed ineligible abstract ideas. Instead, the majority held that a claim should be held inadequate under section 101 as an abstract idea only when, after considering all of the

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from