Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 29 NOVEMBER 2016

Evolving Post-Alice Law On Patent Eligibility

In FairWarning, the patent at issue related to detecting fraud and misuse by identifying unusual patterns in users' access to sensitive data.

United StatesIntellectual Property

In two recent cases addressing patent eligibility of software patent claims, the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit found the challenged claims patent ineligible. In both cases, the Federal Circuit cited its Enfish decision ( IP Update, Vol. 19, No. 6) and its McRO decision ( IP Update, Vol. 19, No. 10) in delineating what qualifies as patent-eligible subject matter in software patent claims. FairWarning IP, LLC v. Iatric Systems, Inc., Case No. 15-1985 (Fed. Cir., Oct. 11, 2016) (Stoll, J); Synopsys, Inc. v. Mentor Graphics Corporation, Case No. 15-1599 (Fed. Cir., Oct. 17, 2016) (Chen, J).

In FairWarning, the patent at issue related to detecting fraud and misuse by identifying unusual patterns in users' access to sensitive data. According to the patent specification, pre-existing systems were able to record audit log data concerning user access of digital stored sensitive data. The invention aimed to automate this process by recording the sensitive data,

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from