Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 08 MAY 2018

Establishing Copyright Is Not Monkey Business

Next time you think of commissioning your dog to create some artwork, you'd better think twice. According to the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, animals do not have standing as copyright owners ...

United StatesIntellectual Property

Next time you think of commissioning your dog to create some artwork, you'd better think twice. According to the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, animals do not have standing as copyright owners to sue for infringement under the Copyright Act. The "monkey selfie" case, as it has come to be known, originated in 2011, when nature photographer David Slater traveled to Indonesia to photograph an endangered species of crested macaque. When Slater left his camera unattended in the forest, the now-famous macaque, Naruto, managed to take several self-portraits, bearing an eerily human-like (but incredibly endearing) grin.

After Slater published the pictures, PETA filed suit against Slater and the publisher, claiming "next friend" status to sue on Naruto's behalf and seeking to administer the proceeds of the suit for the benefit of Naruto's endangered species. The district court dismissed the case and PETA appealed. Although the parties jointly moved to dismiss the case

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from