Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 14 FEBRUARY 2018

Enforce Your Repeat Infringer Policy

Seinfeld famously noted that taking the reservation is not nearly as important as holding the reservation.

United StatesIntellectual Property

Seinfeld famously noted that taking the reservation is not nearly as important as holding the reservation. In the same way, Internet service providers must do more to avoid liability than enact a repeat infringer policy – they must also enforce their policy

The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals so held in a lawsuit brought by BMG Rights Management (US), LLC against Cox Communications, Inc. BMG alleged that Cox was contributory liable for Cox subscribers' direct infringement of BMG's copyrights that occurred when the subscribers shared music with BitTorrent technology.

The Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA) sets up safe harbors so that service providers generally aren't liable for their customers' infringements, but the safe harbor provisions require providers to cut off repeat infringers. Cox claimed it complied and could not be held liable for its customers' infringements, but the district court held that Cox had not reasonably implemented its repeat infringer

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from