Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 05 APRIL 2024

D. Mass. Patent Litigation Update: February 2024

Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
Contributor
Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP

Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP

Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP is one of the world’s largest firms focusing on...

View firm profile
Explore more from Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP

In Current Lighting Solutions, LLC v. Signify Holding B.V., No. 1:23-cv-11398, Judge O'Toole declined to exercise jurisdiction under the Declaratory Judgement Act...

United StatesIntellectual Property

In Current Lighting Solutions, LLC v. Signify Holding B.V., No. 1:23-cv-11398, Judge O'Toole declined to exercise jurisdiction under the Declaratory Judgement Act and thus granted the Defendants' Motion to Dismiss.

Prior to the filing of Current's declaratory judgment complaint, the Parties were engaged in serious cross-licensing negotiations. As a licensing meeting approached, Current first pushed the meeting back a week and then cancelled it less than thirty minutes before the rescheduled start time, informing Signify of its declaratory judgment suit and noting that it "will hold off on formally serving the Complaint in order to leave open a transition period, should [Signify] wish to present a more realistic licensing offer." Subsequently, Signify filed three patent infringement actions against Current – two in the District of Delaware and one at the International Trade Commission – with some overlap of patents at issue in the action in the District of

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from