Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 20 JULY 2022

Courts Are Unsettled On Obviousness-Type Double Patenting

Akin
Akin
Contributor
Akin

Akin

Akin is a global law firm with more than 1,100 lawyers and advisors who pride themselves on...

View firm profile
Explore more from Akin

The judicially created doctrine of obviousness-type double patenting, or ODP, can be a potent defense in litigation. Under the ODP doctrine, patent claims that are not patentably distinct...

United StatesIntellectual Property

The judicially created doctrine of obviousness-type double patenting, or ODP, can be a potent defense in litigation. Under the ODP doctrine, patent claims that are not patentably distinct from those in a commonly owned, earlier-filed patent are subject to invalidation.

Grounded on the principle that each invention should be limited to one patent term, the ODP doctrine was created to deter parties from procuring sequential patents with different expiration dates claims to the same invention, or obvious variants of the same invention,1 the primary concern being that a patentee who obtains such patents could:

  • Engage in serial litigation; or
  • Sell the patents to different entities only to have both entities separately sue an alleged infringer for effectively the same thing.2

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from