Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 25 NOVEMBER 2008

Court Identifies Proper Test For Patentable Subject Matter For Method Claims

Patent Owners, Patent Litigants, And Those Seeking Patent Protection Are Advised To Re-evaluate Method Claims Of Patents and Applications In Light Of The New Standard.

United StatesIntellectual Property
John Lanza
John Lanza
Wendy Plotkin
Wendy Plotkin
Daniel Winston
Daniel Winston

Patent Owners, Patent Litigants, and Those Seeking Patent Protection Are Advised to Re-evaluate Method Claims of Patents and Applications in Light of the New Standard.

On October 30, the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, in its highly anticipated In re Bilski decision regarding so-called "business method" patents, clarified the test for determining whether a claimed method recites patent-eligible subject matter. The clarified test will also determine the validity of issued patents, including those in litigation. The court, in refusing to extend patent protection to a method of hedging risk in the field of commodities trading, made clear that the only proper test for determining whether a patent method claim recites patent-eligible subject matter is the Supreme Court's "machine-or-transformation test." The "machine-or-transformation" test requires that, in order to be patent-eligible (or valid for an issued patent), a method claim must either:

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from