Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 06 SEPTEMBER 2017

Consideration Under Octane Fitness Requires Fresh Case Analysis

AdjustaCam owns a patent directed to a camera clip that supports a camera on a flat surface or when attached to a computer monitor.

United StatesIntellectual Property

The US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit reversed and remanded a district court decision for proper application of the exceptional case standard set forth in Octane Fitness v. Icon Health & Fitness ( IP Update, Vol. 18, No. 8), finding that the district court is required to reconsider the record under the Octane Fitness standard instead of relying upon the findings in the original decision. AdjustaCam, LLC v. Newegg, Inc., Case No. 16-1882 (Fed. Cir., July 5, 2017) (Reyna, J).

AdjustaCam owns a patent directed to a camera clip that supports a camera on a flat surface or when attached to a computer monitor. AdjustaCam sued Newegg, among other defendants, for patent infringement, ultimately moving to dismiss its claims against Newegg just prior to summary judgment briefing, contingent on Newegg's right to seek fees after dismissal. A key dispute among the parties was whether the ball and socket joint of Newegg's products could meet the claim limitation of

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from