Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 28 MARCH 2014

Claim Construction Looks At More Than Prosecution History

Addressing a lower court’s ruling of non-infringement after claim construction, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit vacated and remanded the non-infringement decision, finding that the lower court construed relevant terms too narrowly.

United StatesIntellectual Property

Frans Nooren Afdichtingssytemen BV v. Stopaq Amcorr Inc.

Addressing a lower court's ruling of non-infringement after claim construction, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit vacated and remanded the non-infringement decision, finding that the lower court construed relevant terms too narrowly.  Frans Nooren Afdichtingssytemen BV v. Stopaq Amcorr Inc., Case No. 13-1200 (Fed. Cir., Feb. 21, 2014) (Taranto, J.).

Nooren owns a patent directed to a composition used for insulating and protecting substrates, such as manhole covers, from corrosion, water ingress and mechanical stresses.  The sole independent claim requires a shaped article including a substrate having applied thereon a coating composition and "a filler comprising a plurality of fractions each comprising different size particles, and wherein said different fractions have different particle size distributions."  A Dutch company manufactures products that prevent corrosion and water leaks.  The

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from