Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 08 AUGUST 2017

Case Targets Deceptive Trademark Solicitations

Morrison Foerster
Morrison Foerster
Contributor
Morrison Foerster

Morrison Foerster

With approximately 1,000 lawyers in 19 offices, Morrison & Foerster is a preeminent global law firm...

View firm profile
Explore more from Morrison Foerster

Applicants and registrants of trademarks are inundated with offers to perform potentially unnecessary services.

United StatesIntellectual Property

Applicants and registrants of trademarks are inundated with offers to perform potentially unnecessary services. These solicitations often come in the form of invoices, with prominent and false "due dates." Other times, they resemble official USPTO communications, on letterhead and with an envelope designed to appear as though it came from a government agency, and with a request for instructions and payment. The solicitations purport to offer a variety of services, including publication services, watch services, registration services, domain name‒registration services, renewal services, and more.

While trademark practitioners have long cautioned clients to disregard these notifications, last week one law firm, Leason Ellis LLP, took a more dramatic action—it filed suit against Patent & Trademark Association Inc., or PTMA, in federal court in the Southern District of New York.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from