Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 01 NOVEMBER 2013

Bill Proposes Changes To PTAB Claim Construction, CBM Practice, And Estoppel Provisions

Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
Contributor
Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP

Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP

Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP is one of the world’s largest firms focusing on...

View firm profile
Explore more from Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP

On October 23, Congressman Bob Goodlatte (R. Virginia) introduced a bill that would alter aspects of practicing before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board. The bill, entitled "Innovation Act", makes patent-law changes intended to curb "abusive patent litigation."

United StatesIntellectual Property

On October 23, Congressman Bob Goodlatte (R. Virginia) introduced a bill that would alter aspects of practicing before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board. The bill, entitled "Innovation Act", makes patent-law changes intended to curb "abusive patent litigation." The bill includes five notable changes to IPR, PGR, and CBM practice.

First, the bill requires the Board to construe patent claims "as such claim would be in a civil action to invalidate a patent under section 282(b)," in "accordance with the ordinary and customary meaning of such claim as understood by one of ordinary skill in the art and the prosecution history pertaining to the patent." These changes would abandon the "broadest reasonable interpretation" currently applied by the Board to IPRs, PGRs, and CBMs. Additionally, the bill requires the Board toconsider claim constructions adopted in related district-court litigations.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from