Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 14 FEBRUARY 2022

Artist Jeff Koons Faces Infringement Suit Where Artistic Creation VS. Utilitarian Function Is Discussed

Pryor Cashman LLP
Pryor Cashman LLP
Contributor
Pryor Cashman LLP

Pryor Cashman LLP

Pryor Cashman is an award-winning midsize law firm headquartered in New York City. With over 200...

View firm profile
Explore more from Pryor Cashman LLP

Art Law Group co-chair Megan Noh discussed an ongoing copyright discussion currently before Manhattan federal court as it relates to the use of an artistic sculpture by contemporary artist Jeff Koons in an...

United StatesIntellectual Property

Art Law Group co-chair Megan Noh discussed an ongoing copyright discussion currently before Manhattan federal court as it relates to the use of an artistic sculpture by contemporary artist Jeff Koons in an erotic photograph series titled "Made in Heaven." Koons claims the sculpture, created by Michael Hayden, was intended as a prop for sexual use. Hayden argues that Koons infringed upon his rights by portraying his artistic creation without permission.

According to Reuters:

Megan Noh, co-chair of Pryor Cashman's art law group, noted in an email that the separability standard set by the Supreme Court in its cheerleader uniform decision "is relatively low," requiring only that a decisionmaker is able to imagine that a pictorial, graphic or sculptural element could exist as its own work, apart from the useful article.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from