Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 30 JANUARY 2014

An Accused Device Is "Modified" By The Installation Of Software

Revisiting the wording of claims that recite a combination of hardware and software, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit upheld a holding of non-infringement.

United StatesIntellectual Property

Nazomi Commc'ns., Inc. v. Nokia Corp.

Revisiting the wording of claims that recite a combination of hardware and software, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit upheld a holding of non-infringement.  Nazomi Commc'ns., Inc. v. Nokia Corp., Case No. 13-1165 (Fed. Cir., Jan. 10, 2014) (Dyk, J.) (Lourie, J., concurring).

Plaintiff patentee appealed from claim construction decision and grant of summary judgment of non-infringement.  The asserted claims are apparatus claims directed to "a hardware-based [Java Virtual Machine] capable of processing stack-based instructions, that also retains the ability to run legacy (i.e., register-based) applications without utilizing the JVM."  The accused products could only perform the allegedly infringing operations after the installation of a software "technology enabling kit."  The defendants did not license or install this enabling software, and it was agreed that the accused device could not perform all of the

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from