Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 08 MARCH 2016

AbbVie Documents Not Protected by Privilege In FTC Sham Litigation Suit

After initial discovery in the case, the FTC filed a motion to compel production from both Besins and AbbVie.

United StatesIntellectual Property

Federal Trade Commission v. AbbVie, Inc.,
(E.D. Penn. December 13, 2015)

The U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania ordered AbbVie, Inc. and Besins Healthcare to produce unredacted documents to the Federal Trade Commission (FTC), because the documents were relevant to the FTC's pay-for-delay and sham litigation claims and contained business advice and analysis provided by attorneys, not legal advice. Federal Trade Commission v. AbbVie, Inc., 2015 WL 8623076, Civil Action No. 14-5151 (E.D. Penn. Dec. 13, 2015), (Bartle, J.).

The current FTC case relates to prior patent litigation involving U.S. Patent No. 6,503,894, which covered the brand-name testosterone drug, AndroGel® (testosterone gel). AndroGel was developed by Unimed Pharmaceuticals—which was later acquired by Solvay Pharmaceuticals—and Besins Healthcare. In 2009, Perrigo Company filed an abbreviated new drug application (ANDA) for a generic version of AndroGel. Solvay and Besins

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from