Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 29 MARCH 2022

A Stitch In Time: Untangling H&M v Unicolors

But in February, the US Supreme Court bound up the case, handing down a fractured ruling against Hennes & Mauritz (H&M) over the fast-fashion company's use of a sweater pattern.

United StatesIntellectual Property

Lisa Ferrari spoke with World Intellectual Property Review about a dispute from five years ago over a geometric design pattern that wove a tapestry of misaligned judgments throughout the US courts, even prompting an intervention by the US government. But in February, the US Supreme Court bound up the case, handing down a fractured ruling against Hennes & Mauritz (H&M) over the fast-fashion company's use of a sweater pattern. The court issued the 6-3 decision in favor of designer Unicolors, deciding that a lack of knowledge of either fact or law can excuse an inaccuracy in a copyright registration. Lisa  welcomed the judgment as a boon for content creators and copyright applicants who have a good-faith misunderstanding of copyright law, and plaintiffs in copyright infringement suits. On the losing side may be accused infringers who were hoping to invalidate a copyright registration asserted against them by exploiting errors in the registration, she explained. "While

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from