Member Brad Scheller spoke with IAM discussing how a recent trade secret dispute has led to a Texas judge's decision that, under the Defend Trade Secrets Act (DTSA), there is no cause for action where there has been no "use" of allegedly stolen information, sparking debate in the IP industry.
Brad said, "Judge Jordan's recent opinion in the Providence case strictly requiring a showing of "use" would certainly seem inconsistent with the broader definition of "misappropriation" in the DTSA and would seem to ignore that all the DTSA requires is a showing of improper acquisition or disclosure."
SOURCE
The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.
We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.
The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.
