Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 20 NOVEMBER 2014

Say What You Mean!! Erroneous Termination Statement Binds Secured Creditor

On October 17, 2014, in the case of Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors of Motors Liquidation Co. v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, the Delaware Supreme Court considered the following question certified to it by the Second United States Circuit Court of Appeals:

United StatesInsolvency/Bankruptcy/Re-Structuring

On October 17, 2014, in the case of Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors of Motors Liquidation Co. v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., No. 325, 2014, 2014 WL 5305937 (Del. Oct. 17, 2014), the Delaware Supreme Court considered the following question certified to it by the Second United States Circuit Court of Appeals:

Under Article 9... for a UCC-3 termination statement to effectively extinguish the perfected nature of a UCC-1 financing statement, is it enough that the secured lender review and knowingly approve for filing [the termination statement]... or must the secured lender intend to terminate the particular security interest that is listed on the UCC-3?

Id. at *1 (citation omitted).

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from