Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 28 JULY 2023

Recent Developments In Bankruptcy Law

Jenner & Block LLP
Jenner & Block LLP
Contributor
Jenner & Block LLP

Jenner & Block LLP

Jenner & Block’s London office has built a powerful reputation for representing clients in their...

View firm profile
Explore more from Jenner & Block LLP

Bankruptcy court properly enjoins actions against nondebtor entity after divisional merger. The debtor was the product of a divisional merger under Texas law, which replaced the former single...

United StatesInsolvency/Bankruptcy/Re-Structuring

1.

AUTOMATIC STAY

1.1

Covered Activities

1.1.a

Bankruptcy court properly enjoins actions against nondebtor entity after divisional merger. The debtor was the product of a divisional merger under Texas law, which replaced the former single corporate entity with a new nondebtor corporation and the debtor, which assumed substantial asbestos claims. The debtor indemnified the nondebtor for losses related to the asbestos claims that the debtor had assumed, and the nondebtor agreed to fund the debtor's bankruptcy costs and asbestos liabilities to the extent the debtor's assets were insufficient. A bankruptcy court has related-to jurisdiction over a proceeding if the proceeding has any conceivable effect on the estate. Because of the agreements between the debtor and the nondebtor, the nondebtor's potential liability in non-bankruptcy litigation by asbestos plaintiffs could have an effect on the debtor's bankruptcy estate, so the

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from