Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 10 AUGUST 2015

Assumption/Assignment Of Contracts – Preference Defense

Many preference defendants are not aware of the fact that if their pre-petition contract with the debtor is assumed or assigned in the course of the bankruptcy, then such assumption/assignment will generally serve as a bar to recovery for receipt of alleged preferential transfers.

United StatesInsolvency/Bankruptcy/Re-Structuring

Many preference defendants are not aware of the fact that if their pre-petition contract with the debtor is assumed or assigned in the course of the bankruptcy, then such assumption/assignment will generally serve as a bar to recovery for receipt of alleged preferential transfers.

Under established Third Circuit law, the assumption or assignment of a contract prohibits recovery for pre-petition transfers made to such creditor during the 90 day preference period.  See Kimmelman v. Port Authority of New York and New Jersey (In re Kiwi Int'l Air Lines, Inc.), 344 F.3d 311, 321 (3d Cir. 2003) (holding that Section 547(b)(5) could not be satisfied if the executory contract at issue was assumed pursuant to a court order because "had the creditors not received the payments prepetition, they would have received amounts reflecting those sums, in any event, when the Bankruptcy Court approved the cures of assumed agreements.").

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from