Log in or register
Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 21 AUGUST 2018

Does Your Business Comply With The ADA's Accessibility Requirements?

Ford Harrison LLP
Explore more from Ford Harrison LLP

Title III of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) requires businesses that provide goods and services to the public to remove architectural barriers and ensure their facilities are accessible to individuals with disabilities.

United StatesGovernment, Public Sector
Rodolfo Rudy Gomez
Rodolfo Rudy Gomez
Elizabeth M. Rodriguez
Elizabeth M. Rodriguez
Author LinkedIn connections

Title III of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) requires businesses that provide goods and services to the public to remove architectural barriers and ensure their facilities are accessible to individuals with disabilities. Generally, businesses must provide goods and services to individuals with disabilities in an integrated setting the same as is provided to the general public.

The ADA regulations and Standards for Accessible Design establish the criteria for accessibility.  All new construction and alterations to commercial facilities commenced after January 26, 1992, must comply with the ADA guidelines for new construction. Facilities built prior to January 26, 1992, must remove architectural barriers and make required modifications that are "readily achievable," defined as "easily accomplishable without much difficulty or expense" and based on the size and resources of a business.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

Register for freeORLog in

View source

Related Articles

Legal Intelligence Newsletters: sign up for the latest legal and regulatory news on your chosen topics

Read more about

See more popular content from

Article

SBA Extends Deadline For Comments On Historic Overhaul Of Size Standards

The Small Business Administration has extended the comment period for two proposed rules that could dramatically reshape federal government contracting by significantly expanding the pool of entities eligible for small business set-aside procurements. With some size standard thresholds proposed to increase as much as tenfold, these changes would fundamentally alter the makeup of the small business contractor base.
United StatesGovernment, Public Sector
Crowell & Moring LLP
Crowell & Moring LLP
Article

D.C. Circuit Rules Pentagon Can Exclude Anthropic From Supply Chain

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit has ruled that the Department of War can exclude Anthropic from its supply chain under the Federal Acquisition Supply Chain Security Act, finding that the AI company's ability to manipulate its Claude model creates a supply chain risk. This decision contrasts with an earlier California district court ruling that blocked a similar designation under a different statute, creating a complex legal landscape for AI providers and government contractors.
United StatesGovernment, Public Sector
Taft, Stettinius & Hollister LLP
Taft, Stettinius & Hollister LLP
Article

FMCSA MOTUS Implementation – Common Motor Carrier Concerns

The Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration launched MOTUS in May 2026, replacing legacy registration platforms and fundamentally changing how motor carriers, freight brokers, and surface freight forwarders handle operating authority applications and license maintenance. While designed to combat fraud and streamline registration activities, the transition has created significant user experience challenges that threaten operating authority status and customer relationships for transportation service prov
United StatesGovernment, Public Sector
Benesch, Friedlander, Coplan & Aronoff LLP
Benesch, Friedlander, Coplan & Aronoff LLP
Article

BIOSECURE Act Update: Court Enjoins WuXi AppTec’s 1260H Designation, but Strategic and Compliance Clocks Keep Running

The U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia has preliminarily enjoined the Department of War from enforcing WuXi AppTec's Section 1260H designation, finding the agency misread its evidence on state and military affiliation. However, this ruling does not close alternative pathways to biotechnology company of concern (BCC) designation under the BIOSECURE Act, and earlier supply-chain restrictions continue to drive near-term compliance decisions with a critical June 30, 2027 deadline for sub-tier supp
United StatesGovernment, Public Sector
Greenberg Traurig
Greenberg Traurig
Article

Massachusetts’ 2026 Ballot Questions: What Clients Need To Know

Massachusetts voters will decide nine statewide ballot questions in November 2026 that could fundamentally reshape the state's legal, regulatory, and fiscal landscape. These measures address government transparency, election reforms, housing development, marijuana regulation, firearms laws, and state revenue limits, with implications extending far beyond Election Day to implementation, regulation, and ongoing policy debates.
United StatesGovernment, Public Sector
Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C.
Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C.
Article

Weekly Sanctions Update: September 14, 2026

The Treasury Department intensifies economic pressure on Iran through Operation Economic Outcast, suspending aviation licenses and sanctioning dozens of entities while implementing a presumption of denial for Iran-related transactions. Meanwhile, new enforcement actions target Chinese cybercrime platforms, Ecuadorian terrorist organizations, and Israeli settlers, as Congress considers comprehensive Russia-Iran sanctions legislation.
GlobalGovernment, Public Sector
Steptoe LLP
Steptoe LLP
Article

The Analysts' Brief: The US-Russia Diesel Deal

The Trump administration's October 2025 diesel deal with Russia promises temporary sanctions relief to ease US fuel prices before midterm elections, but analysts question whether the limited supply will meaningfully impact global markets or represent a lasting shift in US-Russia relations. The agreement has already strained transatlantic partnerships and US-Ukraine cooperation while raising compliance uncertainties for businesses navigating evolving sanctions regimes.
GlobalGovernment, Public Sector
Steptoe LLP
Steptoe LLP
Article

DOL Takes Another Step Towards Eliminating The 80/20 Rule For Tipped Employees

On October 19, 2026, the U.S. Department of Labor (DOL) issued Field Assistance Bulletin No. 2026-1, formally withdrawing three opinion letters that served as the foundation for the so-called “80/20 Rule” governing tipped employees under the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA). The DOL also confirmed that its current enforcement guidance does not impose a percentage-based limit on the time a tipped employee may spend performing related, non-tip-producing duties. Instead, the inquiry focuses on whether the employee’s duties are related to the employee’s tipped occupation.
United StatesEmployment and HR
Ford Harrison LLP
Ford Harrison LLP
Article

Noncompete News Alert: Virginia Tightens the Rules on Noncompetes - What Employers Need to Know

Virginia's General Assembly has significantly expanded restrictions on noncompetition agreements, now covering most hourly employees and healthcare professionals while introducing new severance requirements for enforcement. Employers must navigate these evolving rules alongside traditional common law standards to avoid legal pitfalls when drafting or enforcing restrictive covenants.
United StatesEmployment and HR
Ford Harrison LLP
Ford Harrison LLP
Article

Tax-Advantaged Employer Matching Contributions To Trump Accounts Now Available

The U.S. Department of Treasury has issued guidance on employer-sponsored Trump Account contribution programs, creating new tax-advantaged opportunities for employers to support employee savings for their children's future. Employers must navigate complex requirements analogous to dependent care assistance programs, including nondiscrimination rules, written plan documents, and compliance obligations under both the Internal Revenue Code and potentially ERISA. What are the key design considerations, tax impl
United StatesEmployment and HR
Ford Harrison LLP
Ford Harrison LLP
Article

Get Ready Connecticut Employers: New Laws Take Effect October 1, 2026

Connecticut employers face significant changes to employment laws taking effect October 1, 2026, including expanded pay transparency requirements, new electronic monitoring notices, and AI-related disclosure obligations. The state legislature has amended multiple employment statutes affecting hiring practices, workplace monitoring, lactation accommodations, and employee protections. These changes require proactive policy reviews to ensure compliance and avoid civil penalties.
United StatesEmployment and HR
Ford Harrison LLP
Ford Harrison LLP
Article

EntertainHR: Home Runs And Hard Caps: The Looming MLB Labor Battle

As Major League Baseball's collective bargaining agreement approaches its December 2026 expiration, team owners are proposing a hard salary cap for the first time since the 1994 strike that cancelled the World Series. With the players' union historically opposed to salary caps and both sides holding firm on their positions, the league faces a real possibility of another work stoppage that could disrupt the 2027 season.
United StatesEmployment and HR
Ford Harrison LLP
Ford Harrison LLP
Article

Virtual Termination Meetings And AI: When Skynet Does Not Stop

A New Jersey employer faces a lawsuit after an AI transcription tool allegedly captured supervisors discussing their preference for a "strapping young man" to replace a terminated female employee. The case raises critical questions about the admissibility of AI-generated evidence in court and highlights the risks employers face when using virtual meeting platforms with automated transcription features.
United StatesEmployment and HR
Ford Harrison LLP
Ford Harrison LLP