Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 22 AUGUST 2006

Hedge Fund Regulation After Goldstein

The United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit’s decision in Goldstein v. SEC vacated the Securities and Exchange Commission’s controversial rule on hedge fund regulation and left the future of hedge fund regulation in limbo.

United StatesFinance and Banking

Monday, August 14, 2006

--- The United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit’s decision in Goldstein v. SEC vacated the Securities and Exchange Commission’s controversial rule on hedge fund regulation and left the future of hedge fund regulation in limbo. The ruling also left many hedge fund managers who registered pursuant to the rule uncertain about their obligation to stay registered and their ability to deregister.

The strongly worded decision marked the end of SEC Rule 203(b)(3)-2 under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940, but it is unlikely to be the last effort by the SEC to regulate hedge fund managers and their increasingly influential hedge funds.

*The Origin of the Rule *

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from