Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 15 AUGUST 2013

A Savings Component In Child Support?

Fox Rothschild LLP
Fox Rothschild LLP
Contributor
Explore more from Fox Rothschild LLP

I have previously blogged about the permanent alimony , imputation and lifestyle aspects of the Gnall case decided by the Appellate Division last week.

United StatesFamily and Matrimonial

I have previously blogged about the permanent alimony, imputation and lifestyle aspects of the Gnall case decided by the Appellate Division last week.  The last interesting aspect of Gnall was the treatment of child support in an over guidelines case, specifically, college savings.

Remember from the prior posts that in this case, the husband was earning well over $1 million dollars and $65,000 was imputed to the wife, plus alimony. The trial court calculated a basic support award, using the Child Support Guidelines of $997 per week. The judge further ordered a supplemental award of $19,200 per child per year, from which the maximum allowable federal gift tax exclusion was to be deposited into each of the children's existing UGMA for higher education, and the balance remitted to the wife in equal monthly installments.  Both parties appealled with the wife arguing that it was too low and the husband arguing that it was too high.  The Appellate Division remanded because

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from