Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 19 AUGUST 2026

There Is "Reasonable Potential" To See PFAS In Your Next NPDES Permit

K&L Gates
K&L Gates
Contributor
K&L Gates

K&L Gates

The Firm K&L Gates is an integrated, international law firm. As a single global law firm, truly...

View firm profile
Explore more from K&L Gates

The EPA's Environmental Appeals Board has ruled that permitting authorities must evaluate PFAS discharges against narrative water quality standards even when numeric criteria have not been approved...

United StatesEnvironment

On 12 August 2026, the US Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA) Environmental Appeals Board (EAB)1 remanded EPA Region 1’s (the Region) renewal of a National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit under the Clean Water Act for the City of Manchester, New Hampshire (the City) for discharges from a wastewater treatment facility, holding that the Region committed clear error in refusing to evaluate per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) discharges against applicable narrative water quality standards.2 The Region had taken the position that it could not conduct a “reasonable potential” analysis for PFAS because EPA had not approved New Hampshire’s proposed numeric PFAS criteria. The EAB rejected that rationale as inconsistent with EPA’s own regulations and precedent, and remanded the permit to the Region. This decision has implications for NPDES permittees nationwide facing similar PFAS (or other emerging contaminant) issues where numeric standards are not yet adopted.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from