Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 08 JULY 2014

Is Death A Defense To CERCLA Liability?

The Second Circuit recently rejected one of the all-time "Hail Mary" passes for CERCLA contribution.

United StatesEnvironment

In contrast to the early days of Superfund when no argument for extending CERCLA liability was too far-fetched, the Second Circuit recently rejected one of the all-time "Hail Mary" passes for CERCLA contribution.  The case, ASARCO LLP v. Goodwin, involved a 2009 settlement by ASARCO of Superfund liability involving several contaminated mines it owned in Everett, Washington.  After settling, ASARCO asserted contribution claims against residuary trusts established in 1937 by the will of John D. Rockefeller to benefit his heirs. According to ASARCO, Rockefeller over a century ago had controlled a corporation which in turn had owned and operated the contaminated mines.

The Second Circuit declined ASARCO's invitation to apply trusts and estates principles drawn from federal common law. Instead, the court ruled that New York probate law would decide whether a residuary trust could be required to answer a CERCLA contribution claim against the decedent. However, without

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from