Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 20 JULY 2021

Groundhog Day -- More Supreme Court Clean Water Act Decisions?

Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C.
Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C.
Contributor
Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C.

Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C.

Mintz is a litigation powerhouse and business accelerator serving leaders in life sciences, private...

View firm profile
Explore more from Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C.

I got a kick out of Lara Beaven's report in Inside EPA on a Clean Water Act session at the ABA Spring meeting this week.

United StatesEnvironment

I got a kick out of Lara Beaven's report in Inside EPA  on a Clean Water Act session at the ABA Spring meeting this week.

Ms. Beaven reports that Anna Wildeman, EPA Principal Deputy Assistant Administrator for Water during the Trump Administration, suggested that more Supreme Court intervention could help end the longest running controversy in the history of environmental law -- the three decades and counting back and forth over the reach of the Clean Water Act.

I have no idea how Ms. Wildeman can reach this conclusion.  The Supreme Court has already tackled aspects of this controversy no fewer than four times.  The last time, just 13 months ago in Maui, the Supreme Court answered a yes or no question -- whether the reach of the Clean Water Act extends to discharges to groundwater -- with a resounding maybe.  It would seem that if anything is certain it is that the Justices of the Supreme Court should not be asked to write our environmental laws.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from