Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 21 MARCH 2016

Storm Warning For Safe Harbor

The case stems from a securities class action based on statements made around the time that Harman was considering "going private" following substantial changes in the market for Harman's Personal Navigation Devices.

United StatesCorporate/Commercial Law

On February 29, 2016, the Supreme Court denied certification in Harman International Industries Inc. et al. v. Arkansas Public Employees Retirement System et al., thereby leaving unanswered a number of questions related to the Safe Harbor provision of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act (PSLRA).  The petitioners, defendant Harman International Industries Inc. ("Harman" or "the Company") and related individual defendants, argued that the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals erred when it reversed the district court's decision granting Harman's motion to dismiss.  In declining to hear the case, the Supreme Court failed to resolve a circuit split concerning the relevance of state of mind to the efficacy of cautionary language.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from