Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 21 FEBRUARY 2013

"Short Slate" Rules - A Recap

Morrison Foerster
Morrison Foerster
Contributor
Morrison Foerster

Morrison Foerster

With approximately 1,000 lawyers in 19 offices, Morrison & Foerster is a preeminent global law firm...

View firm profile
Explore more from Morrison Foerster

"Short slate" proxy contests are expected to continue to be popular during the 2013 proxy season.

United StatesCorporate/Commercial Law

"Short slate" proxy contests (i.e., contests where a dissident is soliciting proxies in support of nominees that, if elected, would constitute a minority of the board of directors) are expected to continue to be popular during the 2013 proxy season (see, for example, the International Game Technology proxy contest). There are several strategic and practical reasons why a dissident would choose to run a short slate rather than a control slate, including, among others, the perception among stockholders that adding a limited number of a dissident's nominees is often of some benefit to the company and usually not particularly disruptive, a comparatively greater willingness of proxy advisory firms to support a dissident's short slate rather than a control slate, and the fact that dissidents may want to achieve some influence through a successful campaign but may not want to run the company. What follows is a recap of the basic dos and don'ts under the "short slate" voting

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from