Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 14 JUNE 2011

SEC Needs More Than Transaction-Based Compensation To Prove Broker Activity

A Florida court has rejected the Securities and Exchange Commission’s single-factor transaction-based compensation test for broker activity, perhaps signaling a more favorable view toward "finders" in the future.

United StatesCorporate/Commercial Law
Eden Rohrer
Eden Rohrer

A Florida court has rejected the Securities and Exchange Commission's single-factor transaction-based compensation test for broker activity, perhaps signaling a more favorable view toward "finders" in the future. The court held that an array of non-exclusive factors should be evaluated to determine whether a finder engaged in broker activity. These factors include—in addition to receipt of transaction-based compensation—participation in securities transactions at key points, negotiation of the terms or details of a transaction, offering of advice or valuation information, and the aggressive pursuit of investors, for example.

In SEC v. Kramer, No. 8:09-cv-455-T-23TBM (M.D. Fla. Apr. 1, 2011), Kenneth Kramer and Bruce Baker were business partners. Baker had facilitated a reverse merger on behalf of Skyway Communications Holding Corp. and continued to be compensated, pursuant to an agreement, for his efforts in promoting Skyway. As his partner, Kramer helped Baker

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from