Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 12 OCTOBER 2022

Is My Contract Void?

In this appeal, the Eleventh Appellate District reversed the trial court's judgment in favor of the plaintiff on her vehicle warranty claims, finding that she was not entitled to rescind...

United StatesCorporate/Commercial Law

McGlinchey's Commercial Law Bulletin is a biweekly update of recent, unique, and impactful cases in state and federal courts in the area of commercial litigation.

Ohio

Implied Warranty

Banks v. Shark Auto Sales LLC, 11th Dist. Trumbull, No. 2022-Ohio-3489

In this appeal, the Eleventh Appellate District reversed the trial court's judgment in favor of the plaintiff on her vehicle warranty claims, finding that she was not entitled to rescind her motor vehicle purchase.

The Bullet Point: A used motor vehicle is a "good" for purposes of Ohio's UCC.

The sale of goods in Ohio may entail both express and implied warranties, including the implied warranty that the goods "are fit for the ordinary purposes for which such goods are used." "[U]nless the circumstances indicate otherwise all implied warranties are excluded by expressions like 'as is', 'with all faults', or other language which in common understanding calls the buyer's attention to the exclusion

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from