Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 16 APRIL 2012

Financial Advisor Conflicts Update

Recently, the Delaware Court of Chancery has examined financial advisor conflicts in the mergers and acquisitions context and emphasized in various opinions that although financial advisors play a valuable role, disclosure of potential conflicts is crucial.

United StatesCorporate/Commercial Law
McDermott Will & Emery
McDermott Will & Emery
Jeffrey Rothschild
Jeffrey Rothschild
Author LinkedIn connections

Recently, the Delaware Court of Chancery has examined financial advisor conflicts in the mergers and acquisitions context and emphasized in various opinions that although financial advisors play a valuable role, disclosure of potential conflicts is crucial. This newsletter examines recent Delaware cases focused on financial advisor conflicts in the areas of stapled financing, contingent fee arrangements, prior work and the financial advisor's interest in the transaction, and concludes with some recommended best practices.

In recent cases the Delaware Court of Chancery has increasingly scrutinized financial advisor conflicts in the mergers and acquisitions context. The court has emphasized in various opinions the sentiment that financial advisors play a valuable role, but that disclosure of potential conflicts is crucial and, in the Atheros decision (discussed below), specifically stated financial advisors "serve a critical function by performing a valuation of the

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from