Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 03 JANUARY 2018

Altered States

What must a co-op or condo board do to modify its policies for a disabled occupant? And whose obligation is it to propose a "reasonable" accommodation? These were issues discussed in the case Steinberg-Fisher v. North Shore Towers Apartments, Inc.

United StatesCorporate/Commercial Law

Originally published in Habitat Magazine in December, 2017

What must a co-op or condo board do to modify its policies for a disabled occupant? And whose obligation is it to propose a "reasonable" accommodation? These were issues discussed in the case of Steinberg-Fisher v. North Shore Towers Apartments Inc.

Arlene Steinberg-Fisher is a shareholder at North Shore Towers in Queens. The co-op allows shareholders to make alterations to their apartments, provided they sign an alteration agreement that includes a provision that alterations are to be completed within 90 days. If the alterations are not completed on time, there is a financial penalty. Apparently, this 90-day requirement did not appear in the alteration agreement signed by Steinberg-Fisher, and it seems there was a dispute as to whether the board had the right under its proprietary lease to regulate non-structural alterations.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from