Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 28 JUNE 2021

DOJ Antitrust Letter Charts Path To Higher Ed IP Collaboration

Bryan Cave Leighton Paisner
Bryan Cave Leighton Paisner
Contributor
Bryan Cave Leighton Paisner

Bryan Cave Leighton Paisner

UK 2026 Chambers Firm Profile Bryan Cave Leighton Paisner (BCLP) is an international, fully...

View firm profile
Explore more from Bryan Cave Leighton Paisner

The increasing intersection of antitrust and intellectual property laws has led to a number of complex legal issues for which clients often seek guidance from the Antitrust Division of the U.S. Justice Department.

United StatesAntitrust/Competition Law

The increasing intersection of antitrust and intellectual property laws has led to a number of complex legal issues for which clients often seek guidance from the Antitrust Division of the U.S. Justice Department.

In particular, patent holders have sought guidance from antitrust enforcers on issues relating to standard-essential patents, or SEPs, non-SEPs, patent pools and patent licensing.

Earlier this year, a collaboration of 15 private and public universities1 sought specific guidance from the DOJ with regard to a non-SEP. The collaboration is known as the University Technology Licensing Program, or UTLP.

In its response, the DOJ found that the design, contractual structure and antitrust safeguards employed in the collaboration minimized legal risk while promoting procompetitive licensing, increased output and innovation.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from