Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 10 JANUARY 2020

Oracle Concurrent Device Licenses Can Be A Valuable Tool to Combat Alleged Licensing Deficiencies

House of Brick Technologies has recently published a very interesting blog post about how Oracle often approaches concurrent device licenses during audits.

United StatesAccounting and Audit

House of Brick Technologies has recently published a very interesting blog post about how Oracle often approaches concurrent device licenses during audits. If your company has an older license agreement from the 1990s, you may very well have such licenses included in your entitlement. Oracle appears to dislike these licenses because the Concurrent Device metric is more flexible than Named User Plus (NUP). But there is another consideration. When using the Concurrent Device metric, unlike in NUP licensing, processors are not counted. These licenses essentially allow any number of users or devices to share a single license provided that only one user or device at a time uses the license. Thus, they can be very beneficial from a licensing standpoint as the focus is not on counting processors, with all the complexities that may entail.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from