Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 12 APRIL 2022

The Affordability Debate (3): Regulating Beyond Its Means?

This is the third in a series of articles considering different aspects of the affordability debate. We have already considered the right to protection, personal responsibility and freedom of choice...

United KingdomMedia, Telecoms, IT, Entertainment

This is the third in a series of articles considering different aspects of the affordability debate. We have already considered the right to protection, personal responsibility and freedom of choice (in article 1), and recently (in article 2), what the Gambling Commission ("the Commission") has sought to require of operators at present, with an analysis of the manner in which it has done so. In this article, we turn to the wider powers of the Commission and consider whether they have been exceeded, or at least stretched, in relation to its approach to affordability.

The Customer Interaction Consultation

The Commission launched its 'Remote customer interaction – Consultation and Call for Evidence' (the "Consultation") on 3 November 2020 and the Consultation closed on 9 February 2021. Further to our criticism in our 18 May 2020 article ('New Gambling Commission Guidance for Online Operators: Changing the Basis of Regulation?') of the Commission's introduction of

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from