Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 13 AUGUST 2008

Celebrities Snap Back At Paparazzi

The infant son of J K Rowling “M”, issued a court case against a photographic agency for breach of his right to respect for his privacy under Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights.

United KingdomMedia, Telecoms, IT, Entertainment
Elizabeth Ward
Elizabeth Ward

The infant son of J K Rowling "M", issued a court case against a photographic agency for breach of his right to respect for his privacy under Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights. Initially the case was dismissed but on appeal by M the question posed was whether there was a reasonable expectation of privacy. If the answer was yes, then the question asked was how the balance should be struck as between the child's privacy and the publisher's right to publish. The fact that the child was the child of a famous author wasn't enough to consider that he had no reasonable expectation of privacy. The case was allowed on appeal and will be permitted to proceed to trial. The judge said that the law should protect children from intrusive media attention, particularly where the photographs taken in a public place would be objected to on his behalf.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from