Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 30 JULY 2020

TCC Stays Proceedings Where Smash And Grab Decision Remained Unpaid

Charles Russell Speechlys LLP
Charles Russell Speechlys LLP
Contributor
Charles Russell Speechlys LLP

Charles Russell Speechlys LLP

Charles Russell Speechlys is an international law firm with a focus on private capital, at the...

View firm profile
Explore more from Charles Russell Speechlys LLP

Kew engaged Donald Insall Associates to provide architectural services as part of a project to convert and refurbish The King's Observatory in Richmond to form a private residence.

United KingdomLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

Last week's judgment in the case of Kew Holdings Ltd v Donald Insall Associates Ltd [2020] EWHC 1862 (TCC) again emphasised the Technology and Construction Court's position that it will as much as possible give effect to Adjudicators' decisions and paying parties' attempts to avoid payment will hold little truck with them.

The Facts

Kew engaged Donald Insall Associates to provide architectural services as part of a project to convert and refurbish The King's Observatory in Richmond to form a private residence.

In 2018, disputes arose between the parties concerning Donald Insall's entitlement to unpaid fees. Donald Insall commenced a smash and grab adjudication and was awarded just over £200,000.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from