Could the rise of generative AI lead to more regulatory complaints and increased pressure on disciplinary processes?
In his keynote address to Oxford Civil Justice Systems in the 21st Century Conference in May 2026 titled “AI and Civil Justice: Preparing for the Tsunami”, Lord Briggs warned that the courts would see a “tsunami” of small to medium value civil claims from litigants in person caused by the use of generative AI.
While the speech was about claims, at least in that context the rules on costs (certainly in theory) stand as a (potential) guard against abuse of the system. But what about in the disciplinary arena where = when considering complaints to regulators – in most contexts the costs guardian has yet to be deployed?