Log in or register
Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 02 DECEMBER 2005

The Sun Rises on .EU Domain Names

Bristows LLP
Bristows LLP
Contributor
Bristows LLP

Bristows LLP

We are Bristows, the world’s leading specialist law firm for clients that innovate. We are a London...

View firm profile
Explore more from Bristows LLP

Registrations of the new .EU domain names will start on 7 December 2005. To protect the interests of brand owners and companies there will be a "sunrise" period in which they will be allowed to apply for .EU domain names corresponding to their trade marks and company names.

United KingdomIntellectual Property

Registrations of the new .EU domain names will start on 7 December 2005. To protect the interests of brand owners and companies there will be a "sunrise" period in which they will be allowed to apply for .EU domain names corresponding to their trade marks and company names. The general public will have to wait until 7 April 2006 before they can make applications. It is hoped that this head start will help to prevent a flood of abusive registrations by cyber-squatters, but brand owners and companies will need to act quickly to take full advantage of it.

Sunrise Period

The sunrise period is split into 2 distinct phases. Phase 1 commences on 7 December and runs for 2 months. During this initial phase, brand owners will be able to apply to register .EU domain names corresponding only to their registered trademarks.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

Register for freeORLog in

Related Articles

Legal Intelligence Newsletters: sign up for the latest legal and regulatory news on your chosen topics

Read more about

Related Comparative Guides

See more popular content from

Article

AI, Deepfakes And Image Rights: Does English Law Protect Your Face, Voice And Likeness?

Generative AI has created a legal vacuum where synthetic images and deepfakes can be created and shared without consent, yet English law offers no standalone "image right" to protect individuals. With celebrities like Lisa Riley and over 80 performers demanding reform, the question is whether the UK's patchwork of intellectual property, data protection, and common law protections can adequately address this rapidly evolving threat to personal autonomy and reputation.
United KingdomIntellectual Property
Mills & Reeve LLP
Mills & Reeve LLP
Article

The Sound Of Ownership: Why AI Voice Cloning Is Raising New IP Questions

As AI voice cloning technology becomes increasingly sophisticated and accessible, the Save Our Voices Now campaign calls for statutory rights allowing individuals to own and control their voice as intellectual property. This article examines whether existing UK law sufficiently protects one of our most personal and recognisable attributes, exploring copyright, trade marks, passing off, and the practical steps individuals and businesses can take.
United KingdomIntellectual Property
Ashfords LLP
Ashfords LLP
Article

Samsung Ordered To Pay The Swatch Group US$11.6 Million In Damages For Trade Mark Infringement

The High Court has awarded the Swatch Group US$11.6 million in negotiation damages against Samsung for trade mark infringements involving watch face apps on the Galaxy App store. Rejecting both parties' extreme valuations of US$170 million and US$301, the court established important principles for assessing damages when brand owners don't license their marks and no comparable market royalties exist.
United KingdomIntellectual Property
Mishcon de Reya LLP
Mishcon de Reya LLP
Article

High Court Clarifies The Limits Of Copyright Claims Against Online Marketplaces

The UK High Court has delivered a landmark ruling on online marketplace liability, dismissing Shein's copyright infringement claims against Temu and clarifying when platforms can be held responsible for third-party content. The judgment examines the boundaries of copyright ownership in complex supply chains and establishes important precedents for how marketplace operators should respond to infringement allegations.
United KingdomIntellectual Property
HGF Law
HGF Law
Article

Spotlight On Agentic AI | Liability

As businesses increasingly deploy agentic AI systems capable of autonomous decision-making and actions, questions arise about supplier liability when AI agents malfunction or produce unexpected results. This article examines the contractual frameworks governing agentic AI relationships, revealing how standard IT contracts may inadequately address the unique risks of autonomous AI systems and exploring strategies for customers to better protect themselves against potential losses from AI agent failures.
United KingdomCorporate/Commercial Law
Bristows LLP
Bristows LLP
Podcast

(Medical) Crimes And (Data) Misdemeanours - Writing To The European Commission’s AI Act Service Desk Concerning Annex V Of The EU AI Act (Conformity Assessments) - LIVE! (Podcast)

Marc Dautlich and Alex Denoon explore the complexities of the EU AI Act's Declaration of Conformity requirements, specifically examining what it means for High-Risk AI Systems to comply with GDPR. The podcast addresses the practical challenges providers face when preparing this living document for AI-integrated medical devices and other regulated systems.
United KingdomFood, Drugs, Healthcare, Life Sciences
Bristows LLP
Bristows LLP
Article

SAS Institute Inc v. World Programming Limited The ECJ Reference And Potential Implications For Software Licensors

The proceedings between SAS Institute Inc ("SAS") and World Programming Limited, ("WPL") which led to an extensive judgment from Mr Justice Arnold in July 2010, have resulted in nine questions, principally relating to the interpretation of the Software Directive, being referred to the Court of Justice of the European Union ("ECJ").
United KingdomIntellectual Property
Bristows LLP
Bristows LLP