Log in or register
Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 07 MAY 2010

Heavyweight April 2010

CMS Cameron McKenna Nabarro Olswang
Explore more from CMS Cameron McKenna Nabarro Olswang

Welcome to the April issue of the Heavyweight with developments in this month's banking and insolvency law.

United KingdomInsolvency/Bankruptcy/Re-Structuring
Ruth Pedley
Ruth Pedley

Welcome to the April issue of the Heavyweight with developments in this month's banking and insolvency law.

Some items to note this month:

  • The International Chamber of Commerce have published a statement on the volcanic eruption delaying delivery of documents. The statement looks at the effect of delay on the ICC rules, including UCP 600, URDG 458 and the Uniform Rules for Collections (URC 522).
  • The Equality Act 2010 has been published. It will make it unlawful to discriminate against adults when providing financial (and other) services to the public.
  • The Court of Appeal have overturned a decision and now opened the door for a bank in a syndicate to pursue a cause of action against valuers it alleges were negligent. (Helmsley Acceptances v Lambert Smith Hampton). The valuers had denied liability, both in tort and to the syndicate members because they had made no contract with them. The bank claimed to be acting as trustee of the cause of action in relation

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

Register for freeORLog in

Related Articles

Legal Intelligence Newsletters: sign up for the latest legal and regulatory news on your chosen topics

Read more about

Related Comparative Guides

See more popular content from

Article

Woodville Collapse And Regulatory Reform – Litigation Funding In The Spotlight

The collapse of Woodville Consultants Ltd has exposed significant vulnerabilities in the rapidly expanding litigation funding market, which operates largely outside mainstream financial regulation. With nearly £300 million owed to retail investors and questionable lending practices to law firms, the case raises critical questions about investor protection, regulatory oversight, and the future balance of power in funded litigation.
United KingdomInsolvency/Bankruptcy/Re-Structuring
RPC
RPC
Article

Hunkemöller: English Court Stays Liability Management Exercise Litigation Pending Judgment In Parallel New York Proceedings

The English High Court has stayed proceedings challenging Hunkemöller's liability management exercise pending judgment in related New York litigation. This decision examines the limitations of multi-jurisdictional litigation strategies in cross-border restructurings and the enforceability of exclusive jurisdiction clauses for beneficial noteholders. The ruling provides critical guidance on the sequencing of claims across different jurisdictions when challenging complex liability management exercises.
United KingdomInsolvency/Bankruptcy/Re-Structuring
A&O Shearman
A&O Shearman
Article

A Guide To Misfeasance Claims Against Directors

Directors of insolvent companies may face misfeasance claims when liquidators or administrators investigate potential misuse of company funds, breaches of fiduciary duties, or prioritizing personal interests over creditors. Understanding the legal framework under section 212 of the Insolvency Act 1986, common allegations, and available defenses is crucial for directors navigating these serious investigations that can result in personal liability and disqualification.
United KingdomInsolvency/Bankruptcy/Re-Structuring
Weightmans LLP
Weightmans LLP
Article

High Court Rules That Administrators May Be Able To Pay Administration Expenses And Litigation Funding Ahead Of “super Priority” Moratorium Debts

The High Court has determined that administrators can enter into litigation funding arrangements allowing funders to be repaid from litigation proceeds ahead of moratorium debts with "super priority" status, provided this aligns with the administration's purpose and the administrators' duties. This ruling addresses a critical question about the interplay between protected moratorium creditors and the practical realities of funding litigation in insolvency proceedings.
United KingdomInsolvency/Bankruptcy/Re-Structuring
Herbert Smith Freehills Kramer LLP
Herbert Smith Freehills Kramer LLP
Article

Mental Health Moratorium Fails To Block Receiver Sale

The High Court has clarified the interaction between mental health crisis moratoriums under the Debt Respite Scheme and secured lending enforcement. When property security covers a company's debt rather than an individual's personal liability, receivers can proceed with sales despite the moratorium. This decision provides crucial guidance for insolvency practitioners and lenders navigating the complex intersection of mental health protections and security enforcement.
United KingdomInsolvency/Bankruptcy/Re-Structuring
Mills & Reeve LLP
Mills & Reeve LLP