Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 27 OCTOBER 2014

Mis-selling Update: Crestsign v Natwest & RBS

Financial services cases, including those concerning mis-selling, remain in focus – Crestsign Limited v Natwest & RBS [2014] EWHC 3043 (Ch) ("Crestsign") being the most recent example.

United KingdomFinance and Banking
Aimee Brookes
Aimee Brookes
Gurpreet Chhokar
Gurpreet Chhokar
Author LinkedIn connections

Financial services cases, including those concerning mis-selling, remain in focus – Crestsign Limited v Natwest & RBS [2014] EWHC 3043 (Ch) ("Crestsign") being the most recent example.

Pared back to its simplest form, Crestsign was a negligence claim in which the claimant alleged loss suffered by reason of advice given and statements made by Natwest/RBS (Banks) in relation to an interest rate hedging product (IRHP). At its core, the allegation was that the Banks had mis-sold the IRHP.

Despite the finding in favour of the Banks, the case reinforces the challenges faced by financial institutions when selling financial products.

Yet, the decision also serves as a useful roadmap to claimants when it comes to the hurdles they may have to overcome when making out a mis-selling claim.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from