Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 30 SEPTEMBER 2020

Track Record Attribution (Part 4): Construction Hints And Tips

It is of most relevance for a newly-formed manager with an existing track record but without agreed attribution – and hence access to the necessary cash flow data – from prior employer(s).

United KingdomCorporate/Commercial Law

This final article in our four-part series (part 1 (https://www.mjhudson.com/newsletter/track-record-attribution-part-1-designing-the-menu/), part 2 (https://www.mjhudson.com/newsletter/track-record-attribution-part-2/), part 3 (https://www.mjhudson.com/newsletter/track-record-attribution-part-3-who-ya-gonna-call/)) outlines a number of considerations for new managers to keep in mind when (re)constructing a track record. It is of most relevance for a newly-formed manager with an existing track record but without agreed attribution - and hence access to the necessary cash flow data - from prior employer(s).

1. Format. You are aiming to provide prospective investors with an Excel-based track record model. Ideally the track record and the performance numbers therein (gross multiple and IRR) should be calculated from actual cash flows, rather than being hard coded. A PDF summary of the track record may suffice in extremis (or for new managers that are heavily in demand),

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from