Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 15 MARCH 2016

Recent Contract Law Cases

Fieldfisher
Fieldfisher
Contributor
Fieldfisher

Fieldfisher

Fieldfisher is a European law firm with market-leading practices in many of the world’s most...

View firm profile
Explore more from Fieldfisher

The new rule does make way for greater freedom of contract; parties of equal bargaining power will be the best judges of what is a legitimate response to a breach of contract...

United KingdomCorporate/Commercial Law

Makdessi Case

In the Supreme Court consolidated appeals of Cavendish Square Holding BV v Talal El Makdessi (Cavendish) and Parking Eye Limited v Beavis (Parking Eye), a more flexible test on whether a contract term is considered penal and thus unenforceable was introduced.

The traditional English law test on penalty clauses centred on whether a clause that takes effect on breach of contract is a "genuine pre-estimate of loss" and therefore compensatory or whether it is aimed at deterring a breach and therefore penal. This penalty rule has been around for over 100 years and in the words of Lord Sumption had become, "an ancient, haphazardly constructed edifice which [had] not weathered well".

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from