Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 31 OCTOBER 2011

NetTV Cast Into Doubt?

The recent case of AstraZeneca UK Limited v Albemarle International Corporation [2011] has cast doubt on the presumption that an exclusion clause should not apply to a deliberate personal breach of contract.

United KingdomCorporate/Commercial Law
Charlotte Walker-Osborn
Charlotte Walker-Osborn
Laura Friend
Laura Friend

What? The recent case of AstraZeneca UK Limited v Albemarle International Corporation [2011] has cast doubt on the presumption that an exclusion clause should not apply to a deliberate personal breach of contract.

So what? In light of the continuing uncertainty on whether or not exclusion clauses apply to deliberate breaches, it is a good idea to draft such a clause so as to make it clear whether or not it does apply.

Exclusion clauses and deliberate personal breach

In the case of Internet Broadcasting Corporation (trading as NetTV) v MAR LLC (trading as MARHedge) [2009] ('the NetTV case'), a deputy High Court judge held that there is a rebuttable presumption that an exclusion clause should not apply to a deliberate personal breach of contract and very clear and strong drafting would be required to persuade a court that the parties intended an exclusion clause to cover such a breach.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from