Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 06 JULY 2018

Are Directors Going Overboard?

Rigid voting recommendations on directors' commitments risk boards losing out on talent

United KingdomCorporate/Commercial Law

Rigid voting recommendations on directors' commitments risk boards losing out on talent

The UK Corporate Governance Code notes the importance of directors – particularly non-executive directors (NEDs) – being able to dedicate enough time to the companies on whose boards they serve. One of the main principles in Section B of the code, 'Effectiveness', states: 'All directors should be able to allocate sufficient time to the company to discharge their responsibilities effectively.'

The related provisions describe how the chair and other NEDs should disclose their other 'significant commitments' at the time of their appointment and update the board with any changes.

For the company secretary who struggles to arrange board meetings that everyone can attend, whether a year in advance or for some urgent matter outside of the usual timetable, the diary juggling can be a real headache.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from