Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 28 APRIL 2011

Reputation As A Continuous Winner Of Investment Arbitrations Tarnished

The State of Ukraine has ended up as the losing party in investment arbitration for the second time in less than 6 months.

UkraineLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration
Olexander Martinenko
Olexander Martinenko
Sergiy Gryshko
Sergiy Gryshko
Oleksandr Gudka
Oleksandr Gudka

The State of Ukraine has ended up as the losing party in investment arbitration for the second time in less than 6 months. In Joseph C. Lemire v. Ukraine (ICSID Case No. ARB/06/18), an investment arbitration under the Rules of Procedure for the Institution of Conciliation and Arbitration Proceedings (Institution Rules) of the International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes (the "ICSID"), an arbitral tribunal found for a US investor (the "Claimant"). The final award was issued by the tribunal on 28 March 2011 (the "Award"), ordering Ukraine (the "Respondent") to pay USD 8,7 million in compensation for the breach of the United States-Ukraine Bilateral Investment Treaty (the "BIT"), and USD 750,000 to compensate the reasonably incurred legal fees of the Claimant.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from