Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 24 DECEMBER 2014

Trade Name Is Not To Blame (Brands Update: November/December 2014)

The court found that "KAMIANKA GLOBAL WINE" LLC (Plaintiff) is the licensee of the Trademark that is also authorized to protect intellectual property rights in the Trademark.

UkraineIntellectual Property

The most recent court practice concerning trade name protection reconfirms the need to ensure due arranging for protection of such intellectual property and its proper use for commercial activity; otherwise the protection of such intellectual property will get notably complicated.

Specifically, the commercial court prohibited "WINE HOUSE GROUP" LLC (Respondent) from using "WINE HOUSE" sign (Sign) that constitutes the English part of the trademark (above left) (Trademark) owned by two individuals and registered already after incorporation of the Respondent under the name "WINE HOUSE GROUP".

The court found that "KAMIANKA GLOBAL WINE" LLC (Plaintiff) is the licensee of the Trademark that is also authorized to protect intellectual property rights in the Trademark. The Plaintiff argued that the use of English part of the Trademark without a consent of the Trademark owners, in particular, by placing it at shop-windows, shelves, store signs, business cards,

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from