Log in or register
Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 03 AUGUST 2023

Türk Hukukunda Yerel Hakem Kararlarının İptali

Tahan - Cem Attorney Partnership
Explore more from Tahan - Cem Attorney Partnership

Yerel bir tahkim kararının iptali/ iptal davası açma hakkı Hukuk Muhakemeleri Kanunu'nun (HMK) 439.maddesinde düzenlenmiştir.

TurkeyLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration
Tahan - Cem Partnership
Tahan - Cem Partnership
Author LinkedIn connections

Yerel bir tahkim kararının iptali/ iptal davası açma hakkı Hukuk Muhakemeleri Kanunu'nun (HMK) 439.maddesinde düzenlenmiştir. Yerel hakem kararları ile milletlerarası hakem kararları arasındaki önemli farklardan biri, yerel hakem kararlarının hükümlerinin HMK'da, milletlerarası hakem kararlarının hükümlerinin ise Milletlerarası Tahkim Kanunu'nda düzenlenmiş olmasıdır. Bu yazımızda, yerel tahkim kararlarının iptali üzerinde duracağız.

İptal davası, HMK'nın 439.maddesinde belirtilen şartların varlığı halinde açılabilir. Buna doğrultuda, tahkim kararından memnun kalmayan taraf Bölge Adliye Mahkemesi'ne (BAM) giderek kararın iptali için iptal davası açabilir.

HMK 439/1 maddesi şu şekilde düzenlenmiştir:

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

Register for freeORLog in

View source

Related Articles

Legal Intelligence Newsletters: sign up for the latest legal and regulatory news on your chosen topics

Read more about

Related Comparative Guides

See more popular content from

Article

The Competence-Competence Principle

The competence-competence principle grants arbitral tribunals the authority to determine their own jurisdiction, including questions about the validity and scope of arbitration agreements. This article examines how Turkish law implements this fundamental arbitration doctrine through statutory provisions and judicial precedent, analyzing the balance between arbitral autonomy and judicial oversight in both domestic and international arbitration proceedings.
TurkeyLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration
Kesikli Law Firm
Kesikli Law Firm
Article

Recognition And Enforcement Of Foreign Judgments In Turkey 2026

This article examines the recognition and enforcement of foreign court judgments in Turkey. It considers finality, reciprocity, jurisdiction, public policy, service, documentary requirements, security and the relationship between enforcement permission and actual collection. The discussion distinguishes foreign judgments from arbitral awards and from decisions eligible for a separate administrative registration route.
TurkeyLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration
ONGUR & PARTNERS
ONGUR & PARTNERS
Article

Inheritance Fraud Lawsuits: Legal Nature, Requirements, And Litigation Process

Inheritance fraud (muris muvazaası) is one of the most common inheritance-related disputes in Turkish legal practice. It typically arises when a deceased person (the decedent) transfers real property to one heir by disguising what is, in reality, a gratuitous transfer (gift) as a sale or a contract of maintenance until death, with the intention of depriving the remaining heirs of their inheritance rights. Although such transactions appear legally valid on their face, they do not reflect the parties' true intentions and are therefore evaluated under the legal principles governing sham transactions (muvazaa).
TurkeyLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration
Sakar Law Office
Sakar Law Office
Article

Dispute Resolution In Türkiye 2026

This article examines litigation, arbitration and mediation as distinct but connected methods of resolving cross-border disputes involving Türkiye. It considers jurisdiction, service, security for foreign claimants, arbitral consent, institutional procedures, mandatory mediation and the enforcement of outcomes. The statutory and treaty framework is read alongside the judicial authorities cited in the manuscript.
TurkeyLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration
ONGUR & PARTNERS
ONGUR & PARTNERS