Log in or register
Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 15 NOVEMBER 2019

Tenfiz Davalarında Görevli Mahkeme

Bezen & Partners
Explore more from Bezen & Partners

Ancak doktrinde gerek yabancı mahkeme kararları gerekse de yabancı hakem kararlarına ilişkin olarak farklı görüşler halen mevcuttur.

TurkeyLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration
Serdar Bezen
Serdar Bezen
Leman Akif
Leman Akif

Yabancı mahkeme kararlarına ilişkin tenfiz davalarına bakmakla görevli olan mahkeme 5718 sayılı Milletlerarası Özel Hukuk ve Usul Hukuku Hakkında Kanun'un ("MÖHUK") 51/1'inci maddesi gereğince asliye mahkemesidir. Asliye mahkemesi ibaresinden asliye hukuk mahkemesinin görevli olduğu sonucuna varılmakta ise de doktrinde ve Yargıtay kararlarında tenfiz bakımından görevli olan mahkemenin belirlenmesi hususunda farklı görüşler bulunmaktadır. Zira asliye mahkemesi ibaresinden ne anlaşılması gerektiği hususu asliye hukuk mahkemeleri ile asliye ticaret mahkemeleri arasındaki görev ilişkisi nazara alınarak, asliye mahkemesi ifadesinin asliye ticaret mahkemesini de kapsayıp kapsamadığı hususu tartışılmaktadır.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

Register for freeORLog in

Related Articles

Legal Intelligence Newsletters: sign up for the latest legal and regulatory news on your chosen topics

Read more about

Related Comparative Guides

See more popular content from

Article

The Competence-Competence Principle

The competence-competence principle grants arbitral tribunals the authority to determine their own jurisdiction, including questions about the validity and scope of arbitration agreements. This article examines how Turkish law implements this fundamental arbitration doctrine through statutory provisions and judicial precedent, analyzing the balance between arbitral autonomy and judicial oversight in both domestic and international arbitration proceedings.
TurkeyLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration
Kesikli Law Firm
Kesikli Law Firm
Article

Recognition And Enforcement Of Foreign Judgments In Turkey 2026

This article examines the recognition and enforcement of foreign court judgments in Turkey. It considers finality, reciprocity, jurisdiction, public policy, service, documentary requirements, security and the relationship between enforcement permission and actual collection. The discussion distinguishes foreign judgments from arbitral awards and from decisions eligible for a separate administrative registration route.
TurkeyLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration
ONGUR & PARTNERS
ONGUR & PARTNERS
Article

Inheritance Fraud Lawsuits: Legal Nature, Requirements, And Litigation Process

Inheritance fraud (muris muvazaası) is one of the most common inheritance-related disputes in Turkish legal practice. It typically arises when a deceased person (the decedent) transfers real property to one heir by disguising what is, in reality, a gratuitous transfer (gift) as a sale or a contract of maintenance until death, with the intention of depriving the remaining heirs of their inheritance rights. Although such transactions appear legally valid on their face, they do not reflect the parties' true intentions and are therefore evaluated under the legal principles governing sham transactions (muvazaa).
TurkeyLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration
Sakar Law Office
Sakar Law Office
Article

Dispute Resolution In Türkiye 2026

This article examines litigation, arbitration and mediation as distinct but connected methods of resolving cross-border disputes involving Türkiye. It considers jurisdiction, service, security for foreign claimants, arbitral consent, institutional procedures, mandatory mediation and the enforcement of outcomes. The statutory and treaty framework is read alongside the judicial authorities cited in the manuscript.
TurkeyLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration
ONGUR & PARTNERS
ONGUR & PARTNERS