Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 01 SEPTEMBER 2022

Consequences Of Decisions In Cases Requiring Technical Expertise Without Expert Examination In Administrative Trials

Gün + Partners
Gün + Partners
Contributor
Gün + Partners

Gün + Partners

We are one of the oldest and largest law firms in Turkey and are considered internationally to be...

View firm profile
Explore more from Gün + Partners

Article 31 of the Administrative Procedure Code No. 2577 ("APC") sets out the cases to which Civil Procedure Code No. 6100 ("CPC") shall apply where IYUK contains no provisions.

TurkeyLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

Introduction

Article 31 of the Administrative Procedure Code No. 2577 ("APC") sets out the cases to which Civil Procedure Code No. 6100 ("CPC") shall apply where IYUK contains no provisions. As per the referred provision, CPC shall apply to expert examinations.

According to Article 266 of the CPC, courts decide to obtain expert opinion in cases where the resolution require special or technical information other than law, ex-officio or upon request of either party. However, courts cannot appoint experts in cases which can be resolved through experience, or the legal knowledge required by the profession of judgeship.

Precedents of the Council of State

As per the precedents of the Council of State, the lack of expert examination in cases requiring special and technical information to be resolved constitutes deficient examination, which sets grounds for the local court's decision to be revoked.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from